Posts Tagged ‘arts’

Live Show

September 28, 2014

I am working towards a lecture and live show with live Painting,Tesla Coils, Poetry, Songs, Sacred Geometry and Free form Jazz….. what more can a man do without exploding on stage.

On my WordPress Blog

My Facebook Page


Book Release – Talking to the Birds

November 15, 2013
Talking to the Birds

Talking to the Birds

“Talking to the Birds”, by Arto Juhani Heino, Volume I, is now available on, 12 Chapters, 356 pages over 250 illustrations and over 70 charts. A diverse compilation of essays, studies and illustrations in the underlying designs and principles behind some of the Arts, Sciences and with some social commentary, taken from an Artists perspective on the world he studies. A book where Art, Engineering and the ancient world meet. Highly illustrated , with artwork, numeric tables, geometries, designs and schematics. It has sections on Tesla, Hendershot, Don Smith, Moray, Sixto Ramos and Ucros. This is Volume I, Volume II is being complied at present.

Here is a pictures that shows some of the backlog in hand written books waiting to be converted to material for next couple of volumes.


I would like to thank all my readers and those who have helped me to bring my work to the public, I am working hard on the next couple of volumes. Watch my blog for some interesting new articles. Regards Arto.


Saqqara Ostrakon

December 5, 2012


Saqqara Ostrakon a Different and Exact Solution

by Arto Heino 2012

Having solved many numeric puzzles using Quantum Arithmetic, I decided to attack this interesting artifact with relish. It seems everybody had a go at this including Graham Hancock. I am glad to express my delight in the solution that I have found, revealing the true principles of Ancient Khemitian(Egyptian) geometry and part of the foundation of building and pyramid design and the reason for their construction principles. As I will show on a another blog entry, I have found one of the the final keys to knowledge of the ancient Pyramidic geometric cipher, no weird magic number or symbol required, this is truly exciting and I will notify all interested parties when my blog is published.

The Saqqra OstraKon was found at the excavations in Saqqara in 1925, the writing reveals this object has a geometric value. The inscription is a form of shorthand to a larger idea.

3 Cubits, 3 Palms, 2 Fingers = 98 Fingers = 1837.5  mm
3 Cubits, 2 Palms, 3 Fingers = 95 Fingers = 1781.25 mm
3 Cubits, 0 Palms, 0 Fingers = 84 Fingers = 1575    mm
2 Cubits, 3 Palms, 0 Fingers = 68 Fingers = 1275    mm
1 Cubit , 3 Palms, 1 Finger  = 41 Fingers = 768.5   mm

1 Cubit  = 7 Palms = 28 Fingers = 525 mm (using this conversion size in millimeters)
1 Palm   = 4  Fingers = 75  mm
I Finger = 18.75 mm

The small curved line and a few strokes and the numbers above is all that was needed. The 98 Fingers was the first clue, this would be the Perihelion or in QA the J factor. The plane number 98 didn’t fit with any Quantum Ellipse so a multiplication or conversion number must have been used, after a few attempts it looks like the prime number 5 was the cipher.

G _ H  = 490 = 5 x 98
N _ W  = 475 = 5 x 95
D _ Z  = 420 = 5 x 84
R _ B1 = 340 = 5 x 68
T _ C1 = 205 = 5 x 41

Now that I know J= 98 then as in all QA you can work backwoods to find the roots of the ellipse. These are the original root numbers that I found:

b = 2    e = 3  d = 5   a = 8  , these will give you J = 10 and the eccentricity of 0.6

b = 14   e 21   d = 35  a = 56 , these will give you J = 490 and the eccentricity of 0.6

The prime factor underlying the x 7 is a way of finding the other derived numbers in a simple translation as J=98 is not a Quantum root size it is a derivation from a physical measuring system from a Quantum number set.  This diagram should explain the geometry.SaqqaraElli4

The reason I exclaimed the true solution is because of the following hidden variables. The redrawn diagram everybody followed by Battiscombe Gunn is incorrect, looks like his pet theory of 28 fingers between lines was wrong, as you can see by the original carving the lines are not evenly spaced, it was only a crude diagram drawn without a rule, you cannot base the intention of the geometer on a rough sketch,  only on the description he gives and the approximate position of all the lines. All QA requires is some real numbers and an approximate shape to define the correct form.

These are exact values with no decimal fractions:

H _ W  = sqrt(  23376 )
H _ Z  = sqrt( 106624 )
H _ B1 = sqrt( 220800 )
H _ C1 = sqrt( 394896 )
H _ I  = Sqrt( 614656 )

These are the values when J=490, they reveal the correctness of the QA precision  You will never arrive at this sort of numeric clarity using any mathematical tricks, the Quantum Ellipse is a unperturbed form and non empirical.  The values when J=98 re listed below:

H _ W  = sqrt(   935.04 )
H _ Z  = sqrt(  4264.96 )
H _ B1 = sqrt(  8832    )
H _ C1 = sqrt( 15795.84 )
H _ I  = sqrt( 24586.24 )

What we are looking for is the gap sizes, here is J=490

H _ W  = sqrt(  23376 )
W _ Z  = sqrt( 106624 ) – sqrt(  23376 )
Z _ B1 = sqrt( 220800 ) – sqrt( 106624 )
B1_ C1 = sqrt( 394896 ) – sqrt( 220800 )
C1_ I  = Sqrt( 614656 ) – sqrt( 394896 )

Here are the final values decoded and back to empirical finger and metric measure

H _ W  = sqrt(  935.04 )                                    = 30.5784237 Fingers = 573.3454456 mm
W _ Z  = sqrt( 4264.96 ) – sqrt(  935.04 )  = 34.7282374 Fingers = 651.1544523 mm
Z _ B1 = sqrt( 8832    ) – sqrt( 4264.96 )    = 28.6720597 Fingers = 537.6011207 mm
B1_ C1 = sqrt(15795.84 ) – sqrt( 8832    )  = 31.7027812 Fingers = 594.4271479 mm
C1_ I  = Sqrt(24586.24 ) – sqrt(15795.84 )  = 31.1184877 Fingers = 583.4718333 mm

These sizes were not needed by the Khemitian geometer to their requirements only the right angle edge and the curve was needed, only modern calculus require these values as to plot X * Y curves. The Khemitians had no need of such crude mathematical devices such as calculus, they treated the curve as a different type of measure than the straight line. Now we can extrapolate the Cubit/Finger and metric size of the whole ellipse.

Length of the ellipse is = 2450 = 490 x 5 in Fingers = 490 = 17 Cubits 3 Palms 2 Fingers = 9.1875 mtrs

Width of the ellipse is = 1960 = 392 x 5 in Fingers = 392 =  14 Cubits = 7.35 Mtrs

The values are correct as no extra bit of a finger is required, this one of the reasons the Khemitians used these types of measure. The translation into quantum units were simple and there were no fudge factors that required PI, PHI or Log, no fractional decimals, only whole numbers  So the final outcome underlies how truly powerful Quantum Arithmetic is when fully understood and utilized in the right hands, when looking for a accurate solution without errors from empirical measurements and data from approximation using calculus.

These and many more are from my up and coming book “Talking to the Birds”, regards Arto

An article by Battiscombe Gunn
Published in Annales du Service des Antiquites de L’Egypte,
Volume 26, 1926, pages 197 – 202
Printed by the Institute of France, Oriental Archaeology,
Le Caire, France

Diagram was created by Arto Heino using GeoGebra

The Nested Magic Square of 15

November 1, 2012

This is a small addition to my blog from one of the pages in my book. This is one of my early(1996) investigations into different interpretations of the magic square sequences. This led me to redefine particular geometries that could be  understood in terms of the changes in dynamics that can create rotational causality, such as imbalanced wheels etc. The placement of the sequential string of numbers towards the center, offsetting one number after two turns and on the third creating a completed section before returning back to the first compliments a vortex action that can been seen not just imagined, actually 4 vortices. I am including this here so to further the understanding of a new way of to interpret the magic squares, numbers patterns that has always existed and never created by man.  Regards Arto

Contra-Cyclic Harmonic Archimedean Geometry

October 5, 2012

Here are some of the files I have released in the Energetic Forum recently. In them I am dealing with a geometry that has been used in many types of machines for thousands of years ranging from Archimedes all the way to Da Vinci, Huygens,  Bessler,  Keely, Russel, Constantinesco and to all the late 19th century mechanical inventions and now to the whole free energy fraternity that seem to think these things have not been discovered before or even understood by previous generations. I am a wittiness to a unique renaissance in this type of research as seen by a multitude of patents, designs and inventions  in torque conversions and unique mechanical advantage systems.These reveal the simple but hidden aspects of geometry, as I have seen by perusing hundreds of patents and engineering catalogues,  still I find nothing historically new but a creatively variant and diverse  application of a multitude of designs, utilizing a hidden pallet that engineers need to know about and define as a branch of dynamic geometry.

Nicola Tesla hinted at the electrical version of this higher geometric typology, most of his inventions had this at its center, where logarithmic curves are not approximated and linearized. The etheric geometric relationships of these phenomena has been elucidated by Eric Dollard in his many publications, videos and writing, showing a precise 4 quadrant nature to electrical phenomena, no Einstein or Maxwell misunderstandings and disinformation required here . What is the core of this version of science, engineering and understanding?, it is ancient geometry of course, or as some call “Sacred Geometry”, the same as ALL the crop circles around the world. The geometry of Archimedes, toroids, pendulums, spherical geometry, Huygens Evolutes and Caustics, Bruce Cathie,  versins, haversins, Quantum Arithmetic(as per Ben Iverson, Not Quantum Physics)  and  Great Pyramid geometry could all be involved. The new branch would be viewed as 3d dynamics that cover those geometries of spherically rotating pendulum, single,  double and triple stages with optional locations of pivoting axis, that could be called an upside down rotating spherical pendulum.

The machine designed by Sixto Ramos reveals this type of geometry very clearly, it relates to the Archimedean twin circle(fibonacci/golden) geometry, as you can see toroidal geometry is also involved. Looking at the forms created in its action you can see a part of the conchoid of de Sluze family of curves.

As you can see I have added an extra pointer in the geometry that relates to the great pyramid. This I will carry through to the Ucros device.

George Constantinesco must be included in this array as his devices are the most elegantly designed and understandable from all the types of these torque converters you will ever see.

To conclude these machines , I have a design that uses the hyperbolic curve as the geometric element in the design, accomplishing the similar results as the Sixto design.

Here is a geometric diagram that includes the Archimedean twin circles and the basic geometry of the Ramos machine  I hope this will help in understanding some of the ideas shown here.

I would love to include the section relating to Veljko Milkovic as his inventions has gravitation as the other inlaid geometry. Some of these diagrams and graphics here are included in one of my chapters in my book “Talking with the Birds” Vol I & II. **note** Volume I of my book is now available at, please check here.